the latest from Conti Systems
short reads & updates
Leading provider for your barcoding, labeling, and product identification needs since 1993.
In small businesses, every second and every resource counts. When it comes to improving efficiency and minimising costly errors, barcode scanners emerge as invaluable tools. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll dive deep into the benefits of barcode scanners for small
Learn how Conti Systems, Inc. can help minimize the disruption to your business. Without a doubt, you are likely aware of the supply chain constraints that we all continue to experience. We realize this situation directly impacts expected shipment timeframes
Many manufacturers believe that the quality of their product matters most, and try to scrimp on the product packaging in order to increase profits. Of course, we’re in business to make profits, but consumers often judge a product by the
Recently, Business Development Manager, Louis Conti, of Conti Systems visited IIMAK Headquarters in western New York. Established in 1993, Conti Systems is a full-service provider of barcoding, labeling, and product identification solutions. The Texas-based company specializes in all types of consumable products such as custom and stock
Shrink sleeves continue to grow in popularity, and appear to be a market driven mainly by the consumer. People really like the attractive full body coverage shrink sleeves can offer over traditional labels. They can be customized very easily, which
Packaging is a crucial part of product design. Used with the right product label, packaging adds value to your product. That brings us to the importance of the label. From brand labels to sales labels, labels attract buyers to your
High-volume 3PL, manufacturing with returnable containers, retail receiving, healthcare asset tracking, and any operation where manual scanning is the throughput bottleneck. If your operations team complains that scanners are slowing down the dock or the cycle count is impossible to
Sometimes — for hands-free chokepoint reads (dock doors, conveyors, gateways), often yes. For pick-by-pick item handling, usually no. Most deployments end up hybrid: RFID for high-throughput verification and barcode for individual handling. We design for the actual workflow, not a
Yes — RF site surveys, tag selection consulting, antenna placement evaluation, and troubleshooting are available without a full equipment purchase. If your existing deployment isn’t reading reliably, the first step is usually a site survey to identify what’s actually wrong.
Wide range. Pilot deployments can start around $25k for a small portal-based setup with handhelds. Large warehouse deployments with multiple portals, integration, and high tag volumes run into six figures. Cost depends on tag count, reader count, antenna count, and
Yes — RFID printer-encoders print and encode in-line. We supply both the printers and the encodable smart labels, so you can produce labels on demand with sequential or WMS-fed RFID encoding alongside the printed barcode and human-readable.
Yes — most major WMS platforms have RFID modules or APIs, and we handle the integration during deployment. For WMS platforms without native RFID support, we work with your IT team or your WMS vendor to build the integration layer.
A pilot deployment in one zone or one process typically takes 4–8 weeks from scope to go-live. Full warehouse deployment, including WMS integration, runs 3–6 months for typical projects. Larger and more complex deployments run longer; we set realistic timelines
Not reliably. Metal reflects RF; liquid absorbs it. Both degrade read performance significantly. On-metal tags exist for metal-mounted assets, and special tag designs help with metal-on-metal stacks. We test in your actual environment before recommending tags or readers, because what
Passive RFID tags have no battery and rely on the reader’s energy to respond — lower cost (often pennies per tag), shorter read range (typically under 30 feet). Active RFID tags are battery-powered, with much longer read range and the
Not always. RFID is better for high-throughput, hands-free, and chokepoint applications — places where stopping to scan each item is the bottleneck. Barcode is still better for individual item handling, low-volume operations, and any environment where RF interference makes RFID

